.

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

Fraudulent Elections: A Look at Russia, Iran and Nigeria Essay

Despite the governments attempts to portray a democratic front, the distinct corruption and fraud mired in the presidential resources over the experience few years in Russia, Iran, and Nigeria expose the reality of the situations. In examining the election processes of these three countries, peerless can clearly see that the electoral automobile trunk is nary(prenominal) independent of the party in power. The poor electoral processes need snowballed into a legitimacy crisis in Nigeria and full-fledged riots in Russia and Iran though the government activity were able to repress these globe demonstrations, the governments legitimacy continues to be challenged. The considerable public outcry against the results shows that the elections do not accurately reflect the intentions of the voters, that there was general fraud in which the vote counts for the winning candidate were significantly augmented. In addition, the cycle of fraudulent elections in these nations has created a lack of social seat of government and greatly hindered the pace of democratization within each of the states.Nigeria has a considerable history of corruption and violence marring the process of electing the countrys leaders. Assassination, voter intimidation, and ballot tampering have all been common factors of past elections sort of than focusing on the pressing issues facing Nigerians, the elections have been centered on the acquisition of power. The 2007 elections marked the first time in thepostindependence history of Nigeriathat one civilian government would hand over power to another, and what should have been a milestone for democracy was instead riddled with corruption and malfeasance. What could have been a break in the long chain of violence and corruption involved with the election process, c... ... (2012) 1-11.Alexanian, Janet A. Eyewitness Accounts and Political Claims Transnational Responses to the 2009 Postelection Protests in Iran. Comparative Studies of rando mness Asia, Africa and the Middle East 31, no. 2 (2011) 425-427.Ashore, Reza. A Historic implication in Iran. Human Rights quarterly 31 (2009) 843-854.Giddy, Clifford, and Andrew Kuchins. Putins Plan. The Washington Quarterly 31, no. 2 (2008) 117-127.Lewis, Peter M. Nigeria Votes More Openness, More Conflict. Journal of democracy 22, no. 4 (2011) 60-74.Nichol, Jim. Russias March 2012 Presidential Election resultant role and Implications. Congressional Research Service (2012) 1-11.Powell, Bingham G. and others, Comparative Politics Today A World View, New York Longman, 2009.Subaru, Rotimi T. Nigerias Muddled Elections. Journal of Democracy 18, no. 4 (2007) 95-104.

No comments:

Post a Comment