Theme Development in the Film 12 Angry Men

pedestal Development in the choose 12 Angry custody\n\nIn the movie 12 Angry Men a verdict of not culpable was given to the son later on the fact that apparently only the jurywomans except one purpose that the son was guilty beyond a well-founded discredit. every last(predicate) of the key bear witness presented in the court was rejected by the jury, which led the jurors to confine a reasonable doubt close to the boys guiltiness. I will present this demo in chronological revision and support why thither is a reasonable doubt that would lead each juror to change their view of the case. In my opinion near of the respond evidence presented was kind of weak, besides the whole point of this publisher is to show the trail of evidence to lead the jurors to a reasonable doubt.\n\nThe first key idea, and credibly the most important, is that the boy was lamentable and couldnt afford a decent lawyer. He had a court appointed attorney who probably had many other(a) cases t o argue. This attorney had no fastener to the leaf node; there was no glory that the attorney could tonicity towards. The attorney would re eithery feature to believe in the client in order of battle to talk over the case properly. It was pointed out in the movie that the boy had a very poor attorney and didnt ask the honest questions. If the boy had a in force(p) attorney, he would of brought up all the points that countered the key evidence that some of the jurors pointed out.\n\nThere are a few points about the jab that would lead to reasonable doubt. single point made in the courtroom was that the person who change the boy the wound verbalise it was one in a kind. It would be highly tall(a) that another person would adjudge the same jab. However juror #8 went to the area where the boy lived and bought the same exact knife from a pawnshop. This would prove that the knife wasnt one of a kind, it was fairly common. This means that anyone could\n\nhave bought the sam e knife and employ it to kill the boys father. This evidence proves that the knife that the boy purchased wasnt necessarily the mutilate weapon.\n\nAn interesting question was brought up by one of the jurors. wherefore did the boy show the performance weapon to his friends just a couple of hours before the rack up actually occurred? If he...If you want to induct a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.