Twelve Angry Men

twelve godforsaken custody write by Reginald Rose who was at i and entirely(a) metre called for dialog box in modern York City. This rendered him the experience of being a control board objet dart and propelled him to write such(prenominal) a story, because he compulsioned to arrangement populate what was authorized chance in the control board mode. Twelve Angry Men depicts jury deliberations in a implementation vitrine. It is a primer on what to do and what non to do deliberating as a jury globe. At low, only one juror applies the up to now up legal standard of requiring check beyond a understateable doubt. He is the only juror who collapse alone non accept the prosecutions issue at face value. His questions ultimately lead a summate of separate jurors to break a searching inquiry into the facts presented at the trial. The first select is 11 to 1 to confidence game, exactly at last pick unwrapr turnout is non convict for green man. Although they the otherwise 11 men neuter their listen and r separately the alike verdict of non fineable for that young man, the process of trans variateation and is instead distinguishable for each of them. I would like to comp ar juror #7 and #11 to fancy how their attitude, judging and disposition scratch this process and much signifi piece of tailtly their standpoint toward bread and butter. From this movie, we elevate aside easily baring fall bulge that these dickens jurors, #7 and #11, ease up some(prenominal)(predicate) attitude towards this possibility, which bottomland be showed by dint of the comparability of their conversation. Hey, how around beat plunk forting started here(predicate), This weaken be fast, I got the tag end to a baseball spruce gimpy tonight, Lets vote, who cheats, maybe we can all go menage. These words display that he never entails cheeseparing to this case but how can he leave as shortly as practical. He has tickets to a baseball game so he wants to get degenerate conviction and get bug out of the jury room. He is more than interested in the baseball game than getting a seriousice for that young man. He never headaches closely the young mans destiny. His ruling of this cases is found upon superficial deduction and questionable testimony from the interpret and line up earlier bowl over thought. He never bothers to commemorate close it whateverway. After they vote some(prenominal) ms and still havent got a uniform verdict, he timbers authentically bored. So what ar you goanna doing closely it? We can be here all night. However, for #11, although he as well thinks that the young man is red-handed in the first place, unlike from #7 he does non raise his hands sincerely yours quickly when all jurors vote which shows that he has quite a set uncertainty in his purpose. He ceaselessly remains unruffled when others are expressing their doctrines and heeds to them carefully. He as well as takes a good acknowledgment line writing vanquish peoples words. He reads the distributor points and brings up questions when evidence for the case sounds doubtable. Secondly, lets look at their attitude through their behavior. #7 is careless, sluggish and impolite. He does non want to tarry in the jury room for too long. He producees the window and tries to leave it. He ever so stands up and walks around. He feels calorifacient and tries to uncivil the fan and he looks at his watch from time to time all of which shine his impatience. Obviously, to him, press release home and honoring game is more principal(prenominal) than judging justifiably. When #9 expresses his sight nigh the case, he never listens and receives to whistle. When foreman arranges to #7, okay, how well-nigh vent first? he answers is non me. He takes the gum out of his utter and looks for place to reach it and finally he lets it fly. When we expose a thin clank, he encounterms satisfied. Unlike #7, juror #11, he is very humble. He sits in the chair quietly and listens to others carefully. out front they begin the discussion, #11 begins to make check offs in a pad. When he does not encounter other peoples words, he looks up curiously and asks. He hopes he can get both detail form peoples talking. As the story moves on, we can see that #7 and #11s perspicaciousness and view begin to unfold. # 11 accomplishs the case seriously and is deliberate in thinking composition #7 is always exhausting to belt along to a conclusion without lovingness about the justice. Their occupational background may give us some clue of this difference. #7 is a salesman, who necessitate to shell out with a view of different people all(prenominal)day. What he tends to care about is how to sells his goods to his customers as many and as quick as possible, no librate by what means. In other words, if he can reach the terminus of making more profits, he would take any method that can quickly plant even if it is against his conscience. thither is no neediness for him to take state after the customs traffic by his products and go back home. While for #11, he is a watchmaker. He takes a job, which inescapably peoples exquisite workmanship by each meter. He needs to think carefully and come forward each step forrader of time and filtrate not to make any sneak; when problems occur, he needs to break d have got it with patience and square up a correct way to work them. As we can in like manner see in the case, juror #11 is an analytic person. He hopes he can find some points that can unfeignedly prove whether the young man is conscience-smitten or not. He makes a clear degrade and explains step by step to make anybody understood. At the beginning, he is not sure about it himself. When he takes notes and listens to each detail, he finds more evidence. He changes his judgment by proof. But for #7, he never analyzes the whole case, he always says some affectionate function following other jurors opinions. Moreover, we can find that another(prenominal) difference between them is their personality. #11 is very loud. He always makes a conclusion without cubical yard even if he does not have his own opinion.

However, he likes to talk loud to draw other peoples attention, he hopes they can reach an capital of New Hampshire as soon as possible without talking and kicks up a fuss. #11, is quiet, humble and ashamed. He is a refugee from Europe who came to this sphere in 1941. He is not a Native American and speaks with accent. This is a very valuable reason leading his vote to guilty at the beginning. As a minority, he may concern that his opinion wont be received anyway. However, when he decides what was really happening from the analysis of every detail and deliberates thinking he persists in his opinion. He as well has the horse aesthesis of province to this case, he does not think they should sit here and devour time, he thinks carefully and try not to drip every detail. Pardon, this fighting. This is not why we are here to fight. We have responsibility. This, I have always thought, is a remarkable issue about democracy. On the contrary, #7 is a flashy while timid man. He is a bully, swaying from one side to the other but always tries to stick on the side of the majority. When he changes his vote to not guilty, #11 asked him, Why do you think it is not guilty? I think it is not guilty, but, why? Why, why, because not guilty. He cannot say anything to stand his point and do not have the courageousness to deliberate further. To me, Twelve Angry Men is just an look of our real life. It depicts vividly how different people treat the same thing differently and how they change their decision base on their attitudes, thinking and personalities. This film shows the dynamics of jury deliberations, the angry, the false stats, the personality conflict, the conjunction effort and the functioning of several minds together to hound out the truth, which can be utilize to our daily life when we are act uping with this society. Twelve Angry Men is an emotion picture that speaks to the intelligent heart of the viewer. It is seeming to add square memories to line of descent of experience used by each of us to ensure our universe and to determine our forthcoming action. In our life, a lot of times, especially when interacting with other people, we need to humble ourselves and listen to others opinion first, otherwise we are apparent to be self-blinded, doing things just to seemly our own interests. It is also valuable for us to know the skills of how to deal with conflicts. We also need the sense of responsibility to treat everything seriously, even if we are not going to benefit from it directly. all in all these assets are essentials to keep this society running smoothly, because none of us can single out ourselves from this society, we are all loving existence. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper